In a press conference this week on New York City’s $12 billion budget gap, Mayor Zohran Mamdani zeroed in on the previous administration’s artificial intelligence chatbot as one of “a number of different things we’re going to pursue for savings.”

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve yet to see any negative headlines about Mamdani ever since hr won election, aside from him opposing primarying Chuck Schumer for some stupid fucking reason.

    Seeing the tankies talk about him on .ml would make you think he was leading the 4the Reich. Notice how the proletariat tends to win when we don’t engage in puritanical politics based off of red fascism.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’ve seen one today: “Mamdani admits massive NYC deficit! Proof socialism doesn’t work!”. Dude, he wasn’t mayor a month ago, pretty sure socialism isn’t the problem here…

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        They don’t like electoralism, prefer to LARP revolution while doing nothing to actually lay the groundwork for one.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I’m also liking Mamdani. However, I may be traumatized because I don’t completely trust the situation. What did Mamdani tell Trump to make Trump support him so quickly? Trump did a 180 over night, and I want to know how Mamdani did that…

      Edit: I get that Trump is impressionable, fickle, and a boy of truly weak resolve. Yet, I still want to know what Mamdani did… not what we took advantage of. What was said?

      • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I genuinely think its because Trump, and all of his supporters, are colossal pussies when actually challenged and defeated by someone willing to fight them.

        If Mamdani made any concession, you’d never hear Trump and his cult not talking about it.

        Instead Trump publicly sucked Mamdani’s cock and MAGA is pretending it never happened.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    It feels ridiculous I have to say this, but it feels so good to hear about a politician just immediately saying “oh yeah, we needed to figure out where to make cuts, and these shitty AI chat bots seemed like an obvious place to start.”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wild that a politician deciding to terminate an application (and its associated contract) because the application doesn’t actually work as intended seems so odd.

    But I like it.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes! It is so sad this seems like such a bold move, but we’ve just become so fucking conditioned to bullshit politicians gaslighting us about why everybody else is just going to have to go without in order to keep giving handouts to the most entitled and useless pieces of crap just because they’re already wealthy.

      Why? Allegedly because they generate more money… But do they really? Have they ever?

  • artyom@piefed.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The chatbot, which was released by the Eric Adams administration in fall of 2023, was meant to provide business owners with an accessible way to check city rules and regulations. But as first documented by The Markup and THE CITY, the bot provided answers that, if followed, would lead to illegal behavior by businesses, like taking a cut of employees’ tips.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s insane that public institutions make contracts based on promises or hopes. They should be with minimum requirements to be met by the contracted, or not cost in full.

      Would the company still go for the contract? Maybe. At least they’d have to eat cost when they can’t meet a defined baseline, effectively taking responsibility to a degree.