I get the proving our case perspective but… I hate that proving the case involves driving even a little more of the AI systems planet burning energy and water consumption to ask these things questions that nobody needs a computer to answer just to prove that these things are a bit shit… Just remember, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; all the AI bros should be held to that standard.
Our collective claim that AI is kinda shit is not extraordinary, and is best proven by just walking away because AI is just not very useful.