Companies keep pushing AI as something positive, in increasingly stupid ways.
From the SAAB JAS-39 Gripen E fighter supposedly having AI, to the Sony A7R VI having AI auto focus, and other weird applications.
As a resonably logical person who works in IT, I can see the Gripen E having the space, energy and general computing resources to run a local AI model, but the Sony A7R VI?
I am mashing X hard on that one!
How much of AI bullshit is just machine learning and just older tech we have had for a while under different names?
Don’t get me wrong, I hate AI with a passion, I am not trying to excuse it’s use, I am trying to figure out what devices use AI branding as a marketing gimmick while using less bad crap, and what devices actually could use AI.
As an IT guy and a hobby photographer I feel like AI is far too much A while inhibiting the I of the user.
Dedicated ML models aimed at very specific domains are actually incredibly powerful, and a far better usage of the technology - especially in locally-hosted contexts - than general-use LLMs. The examples you’re talking about are almost certainly the former. And at any rate, the colloquial term “AI”, in my experience and understanding, mostly refers to LLMs these days.