Because you are allowing company B to technically enter your home. But for them to do that wouldn’t Company A need a warrant for using Company B to enter your home? The same way as far as I know get a warrant to search pedo’s devices and entering home. I definitely know they need to have a warrant to tap your phone and stuff.

  • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t see anyone entering your home in this scenario.

    If you broadcast your IP address in a torrent swarm, that’s now public information. Your ISP can match that IP and timestamp to a customer. None of this information resides in your home and there’s no wiretapping or anything like that.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    That is not how internet piracy is handled.

    Rightholders are so lazy they send the ISP an email that reads like my first legal letter referencing laws that don’t exist in your country expecting you to do something.

    We laughed each time one came in and deleted most of them. The only ones we forwarded on to actual customers was to schools because they can use the info on the notice to plug their student security appliances.

    Back to the original point, if you wanted to try something like getting a court order, you would need to show you have standing to begin the case.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So, I know this isn’t exactly what your situation is, but, it does prove that your beginning assumptions are wrong.

    The FBI and State Police send a list of all known “illegal files” to all the ISPs. The ISPs are required(? It may not be required, but it would be hard to find one that doesn’t comply) to report any instance of those files and the IP and owner of the device that received the file.

    They will use THAT evidence to get a warrant to physically enter your home and remove any devices that may have been involved.

    Those devices will be destroyed after they are scanned for illegal activity, even if there was NO ILLEGAL ACTIVITY FOUND ON THE DEVICE.

    Be careful. Nothing you do online is protected.

    Also, Fuck the police.

  • False@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What? No?

    It sounds like you’re talking about how the US forth amendment applies to unreasonable searches of your home. Generally courts apply a concept known as curtilage that establishes the boundary of your home that they can’t violate improperly. Having records of what was sent and received to your home doesn’t require them to violate the curtilage so the forth amendment would not apply.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtilage

    It’s also not an angle used in past dmca download court cases afaik.

    I am not a lawyer