• DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Of course, the other user is just pointing out that many people who don’t care about speeding also know that the fines these cameras send out usually don’t have any legal bearing and don’t care to pay them.

      • SparkyBauer44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Also, very few for speeding. Majority was “not coming to a complete stop for 3 seconds before turning right on red.” so, driving the fucking speed limit isn’t the issue.

    • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      So depending on how fast the flow of traffic is going, the person going the speed limit is the one creating the dangerous situation. If everyone else is driving sixty in a thirty and you’re driving thirty, you’re the one that’s going to cause a wreck. In many jurisdictions keeping with the flow of traffic actually supersedes posted speed limits.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          If you get a ticket in a prima facie state, the law allows you to argue in court that your speed was reasonable and prudent given the conditions. If you can prove that driving the exact speed limit would have caused a hazard, such as cars dangerously swerving around you, a judge may well dismiss the ticket because your behavior was safer than following the literal rule.

        • BigDiction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          It won’t, but in the US it’s best to drive smoothly and safely with the flow of traffic. In most places that is over the legal speed limit.

          It’s like a school of fish where one gets picked off by a radar speed trap as a sacrifice to the group to keep on swimming as-is.