• Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Summary: bubble gonna burst, when not if

    Why: it’s a fucking scam propped up by venture capital

    How: as soon as companies start getting charged the actual token cost they drop their subscription and for some reason investors don’t like this

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      But the next hype is just around the corner. But this time it’s for realsies, promise!

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yup. Cost for copilot at my work just went up and the tone changed from, “Use it everywhere!” to, “Use it where it makes sense.” I mean, that should’ve always been the guidance but as usual the vendors gave them a good show with their shiny new tech, execs came in their pants, and the engineers were expected to make magic happen.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        My work went from unlimited copilot tokens to $15 per person per month. It’s effectively useless for real work now lol

        My teammates who got hooked on copilot are livid, it’s great

      • pipikia@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Need to look at the hardware cycle as nVidia is still making more efficient hardware to bring the $/token down. BoA dude probably got burned on some loser AI companies that don’t have enough compute to deliver before the bills are due and is extrapolating it to the whole industry.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          First, Nvidia isn’t on a trajectory to bring cost per token down, that’s not how the finances of a bubble like this works. nVidia is enjoying near monopolistic status, as your choice to ignore options from competitors in your comment illustrates. Even if they had credible evidence that Rubin could reduce the overhead of a hypothetical datacenter by 10 million, the business will probably price it at 12 million more (the “value” of the savings plus the value of being able to brag about offering the latest generation). The cost optimization will only come after the bubble pops.

          Incidentally, a significant leap in efficiency could also pop the bubble. The bubble is predicated on all this eventually being very expensive and high margin. If it becomes more accessible without gigantic investment, well the walled garden business won’t stand up. An abundance of supply can pop it just as much as a failure of expected demand. We are talking about the economics of the bubble, and a hypothetical improvement in the merits of the tech does not necessarily map to economic results and in fact commonly is opposed to it.

        • Yliaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I heard google is shifting to per-token subscription models that are much more expensive, and other AI are changing their pricing models too?

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The article gives no specific timeline, but given the amount of Ed Zitron peacocking lately I can’t imagine later than the end of the year. My uneducated guess.

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          With openAI, anthropic, and spaceX all going to IPO within ~6 months of each other, it’s absolutely going to be this year.