ok so i’ve seen people say that lewd things are bad. why is that? i’d like to hear it from you personally.
i’ve come up with a variety of theories so far but none really track.
ok so i’ve seen people say that lewd things are bad. why is that? i’d like to hear it from you personally.
i’ve come up with a variety of theories so far but none really track.
Wanna try again with an opening that isn’t so bad faith?
Edit: Well, didn’t take long to prove my point and double-down. OP laughed at someone’s genuine response. OP is getting the “bad faith troll” user tag
Ask Lemmy communities need rule against these sorta questions
100%, that’s what i wanted to say. I think le,my is also not a ssfe place in gwneral for expression “prudish” opinions so there’s no point commenting to share, ultimately
how is that “bad faith”?
Prude is an insult. If you want genuine dialogue with people, don’t insult them.
I disagree. It’s a term that describes a specific personality trait, which is exactly what they are asking about. If you have a bad connotation with the word, that’s not their fault.
The word has a long history of having that connotation. It has nothing to do with what I feel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prude
A prude is a person with a very sensitive attitude and narrowness towards custom and morality.[1][2] The word prude comes from the Old French word prudefemme also prodefemme meaning loyal, respectable or modest woman,
This is what you linked. THIS sounds offensive?
Protip: if a word has a section called ‘Perjorative use’ on wikipedia, that means it’s not a nice thing to call people.
Just prefacing this by saying that I agree that prude is more pejorative than not.
But, in that section of the Wikipedia article you pointed out, there’s 3 [citation needed]‘s and the citations that are there, are for: two thesaurus’, a book of first names, and a paper on translating indecent language.
None of these actually supports your point, because we don’t know who wrote that section or why, and they provided no proper sources for their opinions. This is one of the cases where Wikipedia is a bad source when it usually pretty solid.
The dictionary definition shows that today it’s only ever used pejoratively:
a person who is excessively proper or modest in speech, conduct, dress, etc.
I have never once heard it used as a descriptor, as that’s not how it’s used today.
You really shouldn’t let silly things like that trigger you.
It might come off as prudish.
Ah, yes “trigger you” yet more sophistry. You’re not here for a discussion, but to win an argument.
Prude today is only ever used pejoratively.
Note excessively.
Don’t be disingenuous and you’ll have better discussions.
what would be a more neutral term in your eyes?
deleted by creator