In ‘The Three Body Problem’, we see a prominent scholar and professor being publicly beaten by the communist party for not denying God’s existence. He goes on to say that ‘Science hasn’t provided any definitive answer’. So I’m curious, <title>.

  • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    People can be tricked is a simpler explanation. Magicians have entire shows where they trick the perceptions of hundreds to thousands every night. Letters and witnesses could just as easily be justified as aliens rather than god.

    No idea what you mean about “alive cardiac tissue on catholic hosts”.

    • root@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      back then, they didnt have 4k resolution footage, so letters and archeological and literary sources are the some of the best proof we can get.

      also, back then, ink, a writing station, a quill were expensive and it was extremely hard to forge writing

      and alive human cardiac tissue was found growing on hosts in a catholic church

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’re proof that people believed a thing happened. Its not proof the thing happened. Im not saying the letters are forgery, simply they don’t suffice as proof. Why haven’t they showed up in 4k to make the non-believers shut up and save them from hell?

        Ddg tells me that catholic hosts refers to communion wafers. Are you saying that there’s cardiac tissue in communion? What source do you have for that claim? Can I genome sequence or clone Jesus then?

        • root@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          they were eyewitness accounts

          who gives eyewitness if they BELIEVE it has happened?

          eyewitness can only be given if you have seen it happen with your very own eyes

          • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I can say a magician pulled a rabbit out of an empty hat, doesn’t mean there’s actual magic. Belief in your perception is exactly how magic tricks work, eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable.

            Besides the church a singular time has anyone confirmed the appearance of tissue and blood?

            • root@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              the multiple experts, and they have multiple photos.

              eyewitnesses and letters and archeological proof is all we have of basically anything that was 2000+ years ago