• iocase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    80% of all grocery sales go to one company

    Regulated for by the government of Canada

    And before people get angry assuming I’m against regulations I’m not, they’re just used as a weapon by Plutocrats to protect their own private kingdoms

    In Canada we have:

    2 grocery store parent companies

    5 banks

    2 railroads

    2 telecos

    1 power authority per province (in my province it’s a crown corp which is fantastic. Their shareholders are rate paying citizens not private shareholders)

    3 shipping companies

    What is it for car parent companies now? 3ish?

    1 gas provider per province

    All of our oil and gas companies are American except for 3

    The only competition is among coffee shops and bistros, and even then the biggest chains are owned by 3 companies.

    • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      None of the things listed should be run by private corporations at all.

      We don’t need competition and innovation in these spaces. We don’t need 35 different kinds of chicken sandwich. We don’t need “options” for gas and electric rates.

      We need safe, abundant, high quality, environmentally conscious essential goods and services, delivered AT OR BELOW the cost required to produce and deliver them at scale.

      Make it all public ownership.

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Big fucking agree!

        These are all natural monopolies. Massive, incomprehensible unbelievable amounts of money need to be invested to make a network, and then running the next train, or adding a new gas or power customer is peanuts.

        Any time suggesting “hey, maybe we should build an entirely separate system so we can compete” results in people bringing you in for a forced psych eval, you’re talking about a natural monopoly.

        It’s illogical to duplicate the network so “pRiVaTe CoMpEtItIoN” now has to negotiate common carrier agreements and the admin overhead makes it twice (sometimes 10X) more expensive than just one crown corporation owning the entire fucking thing!

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The people who voted for tariff taxes don’t know how to read. They just now what ® looks like next to people’s names on the ballot.

  • akwd169@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Bro what is with out fucking government and spending our tax dollars on fucking advertisment campaigns

    God damn just do something useful with our money instead of wasting it trying to manipulate peoples opinions!

    Peoples opinions are dogshit and stupid ad campaigns wont change that

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Two things:

      1. It’s cheaper to manipulate opinions than do the right thing. It’s a tale as old as time and part of the reason why capitalist “innovation” is almost entirely focused on overhyped PR bullshit instead of actually making a good product. Carney’s a hardcore capitalist, expecting otherwise is a fool’s errand.
      2. Governments should tell their citizens what they’re doing. A lot of people don’t see things in the news but still need to know. Yes it can be misused, but that doesn’t make it inherently bad.
  • ZeroCool@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If MAGA could read, they’d be very upset about that billboard.

    • Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks for sharing this article. The ending of it aged really interestingly with the part about Venezuela

  • kinship@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This hurts my brain. I know it is playing a joke on american rational on Trumps tarrifs but can someone ELI5 the logic (or lack thereof) used to defend that view point?

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      do you mean the viewpoint of tarrifs are tax? they are. they are an import tax paid by the us importers to take possession of foreign goods.

      • kinship@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Paid by the government? Still don’t get it taxes are paid by the consumer of goods in that case.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          oh the advertisement was paid by the government. its an ad campaign against the tarrifs. I thought you meant the general message of the advertisement.

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Every government advertisement contains that tag line, or similar - provincial advertisements say “Paid for by the government of <province”, campaign ads use the party name in the tag line. Most Canadians are used to seeing this, and won’t conflate the tagline as being part of the ad itself.