New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, once a figure of contention among leaders from both major political parties, has seen a remarkable surge in his political standing just six months into office.

The 34-year-old democratic socialist, a prominent figure on the progressive left, has garnered unexpected praise from both Donald Trump and New York Governor Kathy Hochul.

He has also emerged as the face of the region’s sports renaissance. Now, days before New York’s primary elections,

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    As he should. We need to take any populist progressive momentum we have and use it to run the Democrats out of town. Along with the republicans. The two parties are just a black hole of corporate money.

    • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because, you know, he has and will continue to reject that money. Because he is so great and has such great ethics and morals…

      Totally wouldn’t become the exact same thing. Or worse.

  • Ardha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    you know mamdani is still a democrat right? He is still approved by the richoids of america, y’know the guys who’ve been terrorizing the world for decades, and he already gave up on being anti cop. Ultimately guys like him are just there to fool you that the system can be change by voting, doing slight improvement so the system survives until it can take those improvements away.

      • Ardha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s just a show. He is still there, not to mention Bernie sanders is also a Zionist who turns American rage at the system into votes for democrats. I mean come on, Zoharan said he’d defund the police, where is that now?

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The system has improved by voting. Like, take a quick gander through history. We’re in a down trend right now, and we need to fight, and fight to improve the system, but to deny that the system can change by voting is to deny history

      • Ardha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, the system never ever improved by voting. It only ever improved in response to fear of revolution, and any “improvement” through voting was nothing more than a temporary concession, Britain used to be the face of social democracy then Thatcher came and since then standard of living has been constantly getting lower, Obama brought Obama care(which was absolutely not enough) because Occupy wallstreet happened, then trump came and gutted it. You can’t change and improve a system that’s built to keep you down, by working from inside of it

    • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      liberals are going to be shocked when his successors revert everything good he’s done, as always

  • abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’m not partial to some of his politics, but he seems like a genuinely good guy. Both parties need more good and young guys and gals, Republicans most of all, but Democrats too.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    “We were surprised to discover that, underneath all the bullshit, people just want happiness, peace and opportunity”.

  • MortUS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    As long as he does progressive things, cool, but I think he’s a plant to the stark contrast that is DJT. American politics just don’t change.

    • GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Planted by whom? The democrat establishment that dragged their feet on giving him any support whatsoever? The republicans who were urging their own candidate to drop out in order to give Cuomo an edge? High roller donors who were desperately trying to prop Cuomo up? Seems like the entire establishment across the political spectrum was against Mamdami. The wealthy and powerful clearly did not want him in office, I don’t think there was some 5D chess gambit behind their opposition.

      • MortUS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        We must have watched different mayorital races. Cuomo very much phoned in the whole run and was showing up just to show up. He also netted less donations than both Mamdani and his previous mayor run (~$40 mill difference [2018], which may as well be $40 dollars). Since then Mamdani has very much gotten the Obama treatment. I very much suspect he’s going to run for President in my lifetime and win. I also very much think he’s a manchurian candidate.

        I don’t think he would be a bad president by any means - I’d vote for him, like I don’t think he’s going to turn heel and we all find out he’s republican or anything, I think it’s just part of balancing the status quo being upkept in American Politics.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I very much suspect he’s going to run for President in my lifetime and win.

          Isn’t he born in Uganda, disqualifying him from being a candidate for President?

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      He’s six months in and like ⅔ of the way through his campaign promises. And that’s with standing against ICE and dealing with both an extreme winter and and extreme summer. He defeated multiple establishment-backed candidates. And he’s managed to do this all without any major scandal.

      Plus, if this is a psyop by the right, it’s absolutely backfiring. Mamdani is showing the electorate how a government can work for its people. That’s good for people, but terrible for the establishment.

      I realize where the cynicism comes from, but “just don’t change” is always true right up until it isn’t.

      • MortUS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nope, it’s all opinion based on his interactions between high level individuals. Last time I posted my opinion on it the moderators here removed it as conspiracy theories - which is valid, as they are that.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      He’s a DSA member! I’d call him a DINO if he wasn’t evidently reshaping it.

      I’ll vote third party as soon as the next guy, but if the Democrats decide to run an actually good candidate, then I’m not holding a grudge.

    • Worstdriver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m not an American, so I could be incredibly wrong here, but don’t you have a two party system? If you don’t vote Democrat, who do you vote for?

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The US has over 50 parties, depending on where you vote.

        Democrat, Republican, Green, Libertarian, Constitution, Peace and Freedom, No Labels, Progressive, Socialist, etc

        • Worstdriver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Then why do I only ever see ® or (D) behind names in your government? Why don’t I hear about the Green party candidate for Senate, or the Libertarian in a state legislature? I mean, you say there are other parties, but if they exist surely someone from one of them has made it into the government of a state or to the federal level at some point.

          Not trying to be argumentative here, just trying to understand.

          • quick_snail@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            You’re probably watching shitty corporate news that’s intentionally trying to tell their viewers that the only option is the 1 party (both democrats and republican parties are nearly identical when you zoom out to include progressive policies)

            The US has great independent media. Try reading something run by a nonprofit that does not take money from corporate sponsors.

            • Worstdriver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              CBC BBC Reuters…

              And it’s not just them, but those tend to be my primary y news sources.

              Diversion aside, can you name any examples of non Democrat or Republican legislators at the state or federal level?

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The person you replied to is trying to help make things even worse. Especially in a post about primaries, which Are the opportunities to make things better.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Isn’t he self-described as a “democratic socialist”? (I mean, his faction aren’t super radical socialist as far as I’m aware, in terms of trying to bring about a workers democracy. The NYC “city run” grocery stores are just contacted out, not actually city run. But hey, it’s way, way, way better than what other US political factions are doing)

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Electing someone who is actually DOING STUFF for the city he’s elected to run? I mean, yeah we should totally hate that. 😩

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      TBF he’s renegged on a lot of his plans and watered down all of his enacted ones.

      Pretty normal for the DNC.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, wtf is wrong with Mamdani.

      Doesnt he know hes supposed to make big promises, then do none of it while giving handies to CEOs in his office before selling his citizens out for literal pennies per person?

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      electing someone who even understands what their job even is seems to be a welcome change. Schumer claims his whole job is keeping the dems in line with what a foreign power wants. And a bunch of Dems in congress seem to agree. Thats not their job at all. And that rot goes top to bottom through both parties. The president and judiciary also dont seem to understand what their jobs are anymore. Cops too, no frickin idea what they do exactly.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Republicans, propping up Mamdani?

    Interesting strategy. But you know what they say, never interrupt your enemy while they’re making a fatal mistake.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The fascists are on Russia. They have literally been funding right wing extremism all across Europe and the world for decades, as a matter of stated intent and strategy and they’ve been caught doing it straight up.

          Tiktok only exacerbates the issue, but make no mistake, Russia bears by far the biggest part of the blame.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        are there? hard to say with none of them in charge of anything. So where’d you se that, some TV show?

        Seems to me when we get the oldsters out of the way, a lot of problems also go away. ever notice how racism and sexism is much more prevalent and “normal” with older people? Stands to reason that putting those people in care homes and out of power would make drastic improvements to society.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Are you familiar with the Joshua Generation at all? Literally a training ground for christo-fascists that trained former and current senators.

          There’s absolutely young fascists currently in charge. Heck “DOGE” was nothing but a bunch of 20 somethings allowed to enact part of their fascist wet dream.

          Putting the blame on age and not class is why you’re getting so ratiod

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Ratioed? Kharma’s not a thing here so who cares. And maybe I’ve just met more old people than you have.
            Also your Joshua generation thing doesnt show a prevalance for idiocy in youth, just that some exists. Idiocy in the elderly is a fact of life. Brains dont get better as they age, and the context they grew up in doesnt keep up with the times they live into. I dont care if people like it, people dont get smarter or more relevant to the times as they age.

            • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              There’s not karma but it’s still a good sign of how many people disagree with your argument and experience.

              Your original comment was to someone saying “there’s plenty of young fascists”. Didn’t say anything about prevalence, just that there’s enough to be a problem. That’ prevalence argument is bullshit you added. You’ve said they aren’t in charge of anything. You were given direct evidence of examples of young fascists existing and being in charge of things.

              You trying to make it an age based thing is just asking for trouble because it’s setting up complacency instead of fighting the fascists no matter who they are.

              “I’ve met more old people than you” is such a dumb and weak argument I legitimately don’t even know where to begin there.

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                That’ prevalence argument is bullshit you added.

                No. Using inductive thinking is the bullshit you started with. You cant use a small sample size to make generalizations across a group of people. You have to deal with any discussion of a group of people by talking about them in terms of proportionality or percentages. You cant say “mushroommonk on Lemmy doesnt underdstand the most basic logic, so clearly no one on Lemmy understands basic logic.” Thatd be bullshit. Get it?

                • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Except the group being discussed is the group of young fascists. That’s it. The entire group is the ones that exist. Your false equivalence trying to extrapolate from there is adding another group.

                  Please just go learn some basic reading comprehension. I’m not the only one to point this out.

                  I’m out

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Teachers are having trouble with boys as young as 8 not listening to them because the manosphere tells them they shouldn’t respect women.

          Pretty much everyone went to school with some Young Conservative type who was weirdly into politics at a young age.

          • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Or at least different kinds of addling. Although, I suspect that algorithmic social media does less long term damage than persistent developmental lead poisoning (SERIOUSLY, WHAT THE FUCK? LEADED GASOLINE?)

        • Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think it depends on your definition of “young”, but there are the folks like Kyle Rittenhouse, Jacob Chansley, Ben Shapiro, and tons of other netizens younger than Joe Rogan with their hate-mongering podcasts. Being emboldened in the way they are, more seem to be popping out of the woodwork instead of being shamed or reformed into better viewpoints.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            So if you can name 4 shitty young people then all young people are shitty, thats your assertion?

            • Syrc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Unfortunately, these are all young people with a vast following of young people. Not to mention Charlie Kirk, Andrew Tate…

              Young people skew left and that’s a fact, it’s not a supermajority like it might seem on places like this.

            • Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              They are exemplars of what befuddled you from the other poster’s note of young fascists out there. Forget about that and just look towards basic reading comprehension to better prepare you for understanding complex concepts like examples.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Oh god. I didn’t do this math. This means that the same people in that age bracket were kids glued to the TV during all the McCarthy-era bullshit. No wonder.