President Donald Trump on Wednesday cancelled plans to sign bipartisan housing legislation in a fit of pique over Republican senators’ refusal to blow up their chamber’s rules to pass his voter ID bill.

The president had been set to sign the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act in a rare Capitol signing ceremony at noon on Wednesday before attending a Senate Republican Steering Committee lunch.

But with less than an hour remaining until he was scheduled to leave the White House, he took to Truth Social to announce that the ceremony was “hereby cancelled until such time as we pass the desperately needed SAVE AMERICA ACT.”


Wroth mentioning: the housing bill is veto-proof.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    He just doesn’t want to get removed from office. That’s why he calls his efforts to steal the election an “emergency”.

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    My predictions

    1. They will be heavily favored by the Republicans for all the gerrymandering they have done.
    2. we won’t actually have midterms, due to Donny trying to cancel them for the ongoing war in Iran if not a few more by then.
    3. total disaster for the republicans, but as a result of that they will cry foul and we will have Jan 6 all over the country and capital again.
    • justaman123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      On point one I’m fully expecting a much bigger showing for Democrats due to dummymandering. Red voters are gonna stay home for midterms

  • kurmudgeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just goes to show, nothing is more important to Republicans than staying in power by any means necessary. They don’t give a shit about you, they only give a shit about themselves.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      He can try, but elections are a state level thing that he can’t stop. If red states want to abstain, more power to them, but there will be lawsuits, and the citizens will win. Maybe some hopium in there, but most of this stuff is pretty clear cut, and there have been a lot of judges siding against Trump recently, so there’s strong precedent.

      Also, god willing, he will be fucking dead by then.

      • Malyca@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s not the issue. He’s a glorified sock puppet, the puppet handlers aren’t going anywhere.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          He’s the avatar of their interests. He doesn’t matter, and yet he’s the linchpin holding it all together

      • redsand@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is wildly naive. It’s unlikely to be Trump’s plan. It’ll be plans made by the billionaire puppeteers of this administration. The ones who bought Dominion and the other major electronic voting machine companies. Prepare for a multipronged offensive by billionaires making all or nothing bets.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          My response was only directed and the comment I responded too. I did not include the other factors like fucking with the machines or voter suppression, very real concerns. It was only about Trump blocking an election.

          I do agree with your assessment on the matter though.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. This is why Trump is dicking with the post office, which is federal.

        Also, if only red states abstain from the elections, then only their representatives and senators will be bogged down in lawsuits. Not a great way to retain control of the chambers.

  • grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I’ve got a house, a very nice house, it’s painted white, people say it’s very nice to me all the time…”

  • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Update: the housing bill only covers homes under $100,000 (Sec. 105). That’s why it doesn’t matter if it were signed or not.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The bill maintains the language in the House amendment restricting institutional investors from buying single-family homes

      Restricts the purchase of new single-family homes by large institutional investors that directly or indirectly own at least 350 single-family homes.

      Sounds like this part could be a big deal, though.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Fortunately, he doesn’t have to in this case. 10 days from the deadline it’s a law if nothing happens.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s not true. Once the bill is passed by both chambers, enrollment is handled by the clerk of the house and secretary of the Senate. Johnson has no power over their actions and can’t block anything since it’s now past his control. Now, that’s not say say he couldn’t try to convince them with the no power he has to hold it up, but I don’t know who the clerk or secretary are, if they would capitulate, or what the ramifications could be if they declined to do their duties.

      • cmac@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a Law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a Law.

        • mercano@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          And these days, Congress never officially adjourns. Even when they’re on vacation, a few legislators will come in every few days to hold a 30 second pro forma session to prevent recess appointments or pocket vetoes. It also gets around a clause in the Constitution, “that neither chamber can adjourn for more than three days without the consent of the other.” The House will be damned if they have to ask the Senate for permission to go home, and vice versa.

        • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Thank you; been a while since I had to think about that one and oddly enough Lemmy is loading better than Google out here on vacation.

  • Stormy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I thought he did this because he was mad about the senate passing the restrictions on his attacking of iran.

    Is this disinformation or was the other thing.