sanitation@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.world · 9 days agoMore people have been arrested over the Reflecting Pool than the Epstein fileswww.the-independent.comexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkMore people have been arrested over the Reflecting Pool than the Epstein fileswww.the-independent.comsanitation@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square85fedilink
minus-squareCrazyslinkz@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 days agoYou got him with a 2 year olds defensive argument. No I’m not Where’s the “I’m rubber your glue…” Or “nuh uh” /s
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-28 days agoAs opposed to his killer argument of: “ur wrong”.
minus-squareBillyClark@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 days agoYou are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 days agoSo I can dismiss this comment because you didn’t provide proof? Or do we agree that reasoning is dumb?
minus-squareBillyClark@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 days agoMy statement was not an assertion of provable fact like yours was, but a method for ensuring that people can participate in debates against people who use bad faith tactics like you use. I am blocking you after I submit this comment.
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-28 days agoLol alright, since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it. Here’s your positive claim (assertion of provable fact): Being a part of an active case is completely separate from being classified. Here is your evidence for it:
minus-squarePinto, the Bean@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 days ago since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it. Coming from null is hilarious, is he genuinely this stupid and dense or just pretending to be a moron?
No it’s not.
You’re mistaken.
No I’m not.
Oh. Well in THAT case…
Go on…
You got him with a 2 year olds defensive argument.
Where’s the “I’m rubber your glue…”
Or “nuh uh”
/s
As opposed to his killer argument of: “ur wrong”.
You are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
So I can dismiss this comment because you didn’t provide proof? Or do we agree that reasoning is dumb?
My statement was not an assertion of provable fact like yours was, but a method for ensuring that people can participate in debates against people who use bad faith tactics like you use.
I am blocking you after I submit this comment.
Lol alright, since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.
Here’s your positive claim (assertion of provable fact):
Here is your evidence for it:
Coming from null is hilarious, is he genuinely this stupid and dense or just pretending to be a moron?