I mean, isn’t the explanation pretty simple:

They reserve the right of the individual to be an egoistic, uncaring asshole.

After reading your comment again: you meant how they applaud the individual act but can’t explain why they don’t want it to be a applied to the whole community? In that case I agree, no logical explanation.

And the plot twist would be that all priest tokens have a mark.

I understood it as swatting in general if somebody made a false accusation and the police raided somebody. Doesnt need to be physical harm involved.

Police knocks on the door and ask if everything is alright? -> not (successful) swatting

Police breaks down your door and stands in your living room but then leaves after realising you are not a bloodthirsty kidnapper -> swatting

Police kills an innocent due to swatting -> swatting in USA

Yep, was pretty alright as coop game.

But I seriously wished they finally let Amadeus, Pontius and Zora retire and let new heroes go. It is getting ridiculous to unlock the same stuff for the 6th time.

And now after watching the trailer: FINALLY. Now let’s just hope they manage to do the transition in a good way. In contrast to the 3D transition…

Yes, but they use not a small amount of psychological tricks to make you play it like a job.

Ah okay, thanks for the explanation, didnt know that terminology.

600 people watched the video and found it impressive.

Its really easy to loose sight of the proportions when it is just a digital number shown. Imagine a full university lecture hall, packed full and all of these people are listening intensely and hanging on your lips. How is that not an impressive feat?

Ah that’s unfortunate. I forgot about it, but you are right, the motion blur is very strong here and there are often forced camera movements.

Have fun, looking forward to your opinion about it in the Kulturfreitag ;)

Oh, nice happy little accident, have fun!

Thing is: yes, not a beautiful face, but for sure an interesting and memorable one. I will not forget his character when I already forgot who pretty face #256 was.

Because you have watched too many silly internet videos that butcher our beautiful language.

BITTESCHÖN, GERN ERKLÄRT!

It’s nearly 10 years ago, so I’m not sure anymore how it went exactly, but what I remember:

Phil Fish was an active part of an online forum for indie developer. His personality was brash/rude/unfiltered, however you want to call it, meaning his answers were right, but he also made fun of the people who did the mistake. After becoming famous, more people learned of that and said: you are famous now, you should behave better and not be rude to other small developers. At least that is what I heard from the outside, I never saw any of the actual messages. Knowing how people can act in private internet messages though, maybe the stuff he got was also not correct, I don’t know that part.

But as far as I know, he felt that he got shit just for being famous now. Since he didn’t change his behaviour! He was like that, even before he published Fez, so his resolution was: don’t publish stuff, since then people don’t care how rude you are.

I mean, we don’t want it in the hand of some entity that hallucinates, is detached from reality and doesnt care for human life, so Meh, can’t really be worse than now.

No idea what he is doing now. I just know he quit developing nearly 10 years ago and never heard of him again. So he seems to stick to his decision

I played it together with someone and yeah, this game is surprisingly good to play in coop.

Yes they do? They are the guard/attack dogs of the bourgeoisie that reigns in the cattle (the rest of us). That metaphor isn’t exactly new.

I mean that’s the point where vigilante justice starts happening. And that is not a good sign for a civilisation.

Thanks for checking the math, that is indeed an ambitious goal to reach.

Subnautica 1 and Below Zero together sold over 18 million copies, so reaching over 14 million with only one installment is doable with the bonus of being well known now, but still very ambitious.

And just to admit: yeah I also think the CEO did an overly stupid thing with that amount of money as bonus. But he also uses ChatGPT as legal advisor, so him being stupid is something we already knew.

I mean, you could see it as an investment? You know, by motivating their workers to create a very good product that then sells very well later when they are out of early access? Like a theoretical normal company should do?