Strikes on Bemani damaged key water reservoir for 20,000 people living in area amid a historic drought in the country

Military strikes that damaged two water storage facilities in southern Iran may constitute a war crime, military and legal experts say, after reviewing media reports and visual evidence of a 10 June strike on Bemani, a small district about 2 miles from the strait of Hormuz.

It’s unclear if the strikes deliberately targeted the district’s water tanks, or if they unintentionally destroyed a key reservoir for about 20,000 people living nearby. But if the tanks were the target, then the legal question becomes critical, Brian Finucane, a former state department lawyer, said. “It’s either a military objective or it’s a civilian object: attacking one is lawful, attacking the other is a war crime,” Finucane said.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    WAR Crimes? FINALLY something to STOP the Law and Order Crowd! ANY Minute they’ll DENOUNCE these WAR CRIMES because it’s OPPOSITE Law AND Order! ANY Minute it will happen! SOON!

  • NightTitan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    That hesgeth ain’t no sissy. He’s a war criminal. Him and the whole administration. Fuck. These. Animals.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Bruh the administration has been like… “We’re going to do war crimes”… then proceed to do what they said… and the lawyers are like “Welll maaybeee its a bit war-crimey…” while the administration is like yeah no dog we doing war crimes.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Dunno why the voters who didnt do anything when they couldve are upset that the shitty govt they got isnt doing anything. Well duh.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        That’s the part that pisses me off most. If kamala would’ve won, she’d be better than trump, for sure. But beyond that, this fucker would be rotting in prison right now.

          • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            I’ll do you one better: if the natives were able to kill the colonists that “discovered” the new world, we could have avoided the whole genocide and slavery thing.

            • borkborkbork@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              yeah because genocide and slavery started in 1492?

              pfftt hahaha… you ML guys either have tapioca for brains or actively ignore history…

              wait, could it be both?

              that said, " if the natives were able to kill the colonists that “discovered” the new world" coulda been cool af. But the Aztecs kinda already had a good grasp on genocide and slavery as their empire was built on outward expansion, acquisition of their neighbors and their property, and they were really into human sacrifice.

              but yeah would be awesome to see the cortez and columbus types torn to pieces on the shores…

              • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                Obviously I was talking about the genocide and slavery that America is well known for. I love tapioca!

                yeah would be awesome to see the cortez and columbus types torn to pieces on the shores…

                Yeah unfortunately they didn’t get the Cook treatment, lol.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Biden’s AG didn’t, and she campaigned exclusively to republicans, no shot she’d appoint an AG who would, for fear of alienating the imaginary moderate republicans.

          • P00ptart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            You’re talking federal crimes though. If he didn’t become president again, it wouldn’t be up to the federal government. He had more than enough crimes against states to put him away for life.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            You do realize Jack Smith put together two bullerproof cases against him and they were both ready to go to court, and the only reason they didn’t was because the Scotus punted until after the election…?

        • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Lmao. You think Kamala “fundamentally the same as Biden” Harris would prosecute trump, after Biden declined to pursue justice?

  • howdy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    bro, whether or not if was the intended target should not affect if it was a war crime or not??

    you can’t just say oops teehee 😇 and absolve yourself???