sanitation@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.world · 9 days agoMore people have been arrested over the Reflecting Pool than the Epstein fileswww.the-independent.comexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkMore people have been arrested over the Reflecting Pool than the Epstein fileswww.the-independent.comsanitation@lemmy.today to politics @lemmy.world · 9 days agomessage-square85fedilink
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoThat’s not what the act says. It only requires the release of unclassified documents. They’re only unclassified because they are no longer part of any active cases.
minus-squareBillyClark@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 days agoBeing a part of an active case is completely separate from being classified.
minus-squareCrazyslinkz@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 days agoYou got him with a 2 year olds defensive argument. No I’m not Where’s the “I’m rubber your glue…” Or “nuh uh” /s
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-28 days agoAs opposed to his killer argument of: “ur wrong”.
minus-squareBillyClark@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 days agoYou are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 days agoSo I can dismiss this comment because you didn’t provide proof? Or do we agree that reasoning is dumb?
That’s not what the act says. It only requires the release of unclassified documents. They’re only unclassified because they are no longer part of any active cases.
Being a part of an active case is completely separate from being classified.
No it’s not.
You’re mistaken.
No I’m not.
Oh. Well in THAT case…
Go on…
You got him with a 2 year olds defensive argument.
Where’s the “I’m rubber your glue…”
Or “nuh uh”
/s
As opposed to his killer argument of: “ur wrong”.
You are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
So I can dismiss this comment because you didn’t provide proof? Or do we agree that reasoning is dumb?