• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Not tryna dox myself but I was able to get a ticket to the Argentina vs Iceland warm up match held 2 days ago in Auburn because Auburn University sold the tickets directly for $78, and they still didn’t sell out the stadium, so you could buy tickets for as low as $40 from resellers.

    And they played Messi too so its not like it was some B squad match, they all actually showed up.

    If Auburn couldn’t sell out the stadium for such a game, there’s no way FIFA is filling any of the world cup matches except for maybe semis and finals.

  • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why would you overpay just so you could be thrown in a concentration camp by the orange pig’s personal goonsquad.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    FIFA and scalpers can go screw themselves.

    Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA’s own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

    Even President Trump said he wouldn’t pay those prices. “I would certainly like to be there, but I wouldn’t pay it either, to be honest with you,” Trump told the New York Post in a recent interview.

    And on this:

    “The hope or bet — for FIFA is that once the matches start — and the greatest players in the world compete for the most prestigious prize of them all, the sport as business lens will fade into the background and the World Cup will be seen and experienced as the enduring global institution that it is,” Shields says. “We shall see.”

    No way. You can’t separate the two anymore. The pretense of “that income mostly benefitting the sport” is kinda laughable now.

    • nullspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is an insanely poignant analogy. At least the Romans had their collosium before they fell. We ain’t even got that.

      • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        But you still have the White House UFC fight. Just subscribe to paramount plus and you can watch people fight for your entertainment!

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No. Plenty of free and cheap things to do that small artists and performers do. The World Cup is corrupt garbage. Turn it off.

      • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Although you are correct, you miss my point.

        In the Roman days, the phrase meant superficial appeasement of the masses by the politicians. It was a tactic to prevent the uprising of the lower class. My point is that these days, the ruling class isn’t bothering to give the populace any appeasement. No give, only take. The small artists and performers are fantastic, but they are organized at the small, local level by the very class of people that are being repressed, and so do not fit in the ‘bread and circuses’ quote.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          No, we still have that. It’s just that the circus is a carefully formulated mix of emotional content being pushed to your pocket tracker and the bread is high fructose corn syrup.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Some year/decades ago Prague was the best place to experience fantastic jazz for cheap money. Probably still is to some degree.

          This was because they had a lot of people enrolling in universities (music conservatories) due to poverty. They even have a one of a kind conservatory for blind musicians.

          The entire countryside was a dead end, so anyone with a remote talent for doing the hand whistle would move from the villages all over the Czech Republic to take the chance in Prague. Education gave them a low but steady income and a chance of getting into an orchestra. Much like Hollywood, right? Except these people got paid to do it, so it obviously attracted many to do so.

          However, orchestras and universities only need so many players and teachers, so once they were educated they ended up playing on the streets or in small dive in bars if they were lucky.

          Mind, these were the state-of-art and most talented people at that in the world. Competition was fierce. Only the best could survive on that.

          As an ignorant tourist not knowing the reasons, this was heaven. The street artists were more talented than the professional orchestras at home.

          I myself had a dream of becoming a performing musician at the time but I gave up that dream after seeing a guitarist at a jazz club in Prague play the most magnificent solo while attempting to keep the band aid shut on his finger to avoid the blood dripping over the stage from playing ten gigs before on the same day.

          Soon, if things continue the way they are, we will find the best computer programmers on the streets, making code for nickels while wearing casts to keep their mouse stain injuries from stopping them.

          Anyway. Romans didn’t do that, but gladiators, musicians and coders are still just people trying to make living.

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not just the cost. The corruption carries a stink. People dont want to travel to america as they worry they wont be welcome by the border control. Nobody wants to spend thousands to end up in detention.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You mean like actual FIFA referee Omar Abdulkadir Artan who was barred from entering the US and had to fly home?

      And these dingbats want people to drop thousands on travel, accommodation and tickets? Tickets to see the event where actual game officials are turned back at the border? Good luck 👍

    • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      134
      ·
      1 day ago

      I live in the US and within traveling distance. I can absolutely afford the tickets. I am a lifelong supporter of the sport.

      Fuck FIFA. Fuck the US.

      • Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 day ago

        Same. I love football, live within reasonable distance of a stadium, and am at a stage of life where I could definitely attend some matches and see some of my favorite players.

        Not even going to watch on TV.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 day ago

          My MLS club is sending out emails offering “discounted” tickets to the US v Paraguay team. It was hard to click the trash can icon while laughing so hard.

          My extreme excitement for this WC turned into extreme desire for pure chaos and disaster. All the reasons I boycotted Russia and Qatar are being done by the US.

    • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s insane. Literally insane. I’m a normal world it would be a joke and they would be laughed out. There’s just so much fuckery going on in the background with deals and bribes. That’s all it’s good for now. Making certain people money. It’s always been a massive drain on resources

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s like several months of food. Or years worth of video games. That’s so expensive. Even if I was a big fan of the sport, I wouldn’t be able to justify spending that.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        For entertainment ticket price perspective, I paid less than $50 to see half of Led Zeppelin in concert (Jimmy Page & Robert Plant show) and it was fuckin’ awesome. But I’m not a sports fan so I wouldn’t pay even $50 to see a FIFA match.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m a huge fan of the sport, living in the city where the game is held, with more than enough money to afford those tickets. I’m not even considering spending that.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        No kidding. Route 3 is going to be madness. I feel a great swell of pity for the poor folks living in East Rutherford, Lyndhurst, Moonachie, and Secaucus.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Same. Used to be up there often for work pre-COVID, and now I just say no, it isn’t worth the money. I’m a central jerseyan and that’s all I need. And Jersey City, unfortunately.

              • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Ha, oddly enough I’m partial to neither because I don’t think it’s that great a meat. I’ll go sausage or bacon with my egg and cheese first.

                And if anything, I would be southern North Jersey, I’m a stone’s throw from 78, don’t lump me in with those Southies.

    • AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve seen a significant lack of discussion around boycotting it. It was a huge part of the discourse around Qatar, so I wish it was a bit more widespread and “normalised” for this one as well.

      • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not a virtue signal any more, no need to announce it.

        I live in a host city and there is zero excitement.

        No locals are mentioning it as a sporting event, it’s a hassle that’s going to fuck with transit and make everything cost twice as much.

        • AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s not about virtue signalling, it’s about a sense of coordination which enables people to feel it’s “worth it”.

          Often people don’t do something that is an inconvenience if they feel like it doesn’t matter/make a difference. So a sense that it is a “thing” could help motivate others.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have been hearing it a lot, but it is quieter and more serious. A lot more people are just doing it out of necessity or cost, too. No need to boycott something you can’t attend or aren’t allowed to attend.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Me too, but I usually don’t watch football anyway so it’s not exactly different from standard operating procedure

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        I appreciate the point you’re making. However, even at a glance you can quite easily see there’s a sudden jump well beyond inflation. On top of that, they also include a graph that does adjust for inflation. They look very similar. In fact, the only noteworthy difference is that the price (adjusted for inflation) has remained flat until this year, where it suddenly spiked.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          However, even at a glance you can quite easily see there’s a sudden jump well beyond inflation

          I know - I can see too. But you show historic prices graphs adjusted for inflation.

      • Gamechanger@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        We did not have 500% inflation since 2022…

        Edit: The total inflation rate from 2022 (Average) to Apr. 2026 is 13.79%

      • dbdr@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s true taking inflation into account would be useful. But when the increase was 5 to 7 times more in 4 years, inflation would not make a big difference.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          It’s true taking inflation into account would be useful.

          Not useful - the proper way to do it.

      • Babalugats@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        it does show the inflated graphs.

        But it doesn’t really matter, it is obvious that the prices now are insane compared to:

        2014 Brazil ticket prices ranged from €69 and the cheapest tickets for the final were priced at around €288

        2018 Russia prices ranged from€79, while the most expensive final ticket in Moscow cost around €950

        2022 Qatar ranged from€450 up to €1,000 or more.

        Qatar was just scummy. The US following their lead is the same.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          But it doesn’t really matter

          Yes it does. There’s literally no reason to not just show the adjusted for inflation graphs.

          • Babalugats@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            They do show them. But the point is the crazy difference is noticed because it’s so high, even without knowing the inflation rate.

            But as mentioned. The charts with inflation are there.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              They do show them.

              They hide them as secondary images. There is literally no reason to show unadjusted numbers for this.

              • Babalugats@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Now who’s being disingenuous…

                They don’t ‘hide’ them, they literally have a big banner across the chart telling users that ‘this chart is without inflation, scroll over for one with inflation’.

                At a guess (I don’t know) I would imagine that the reason for the charts without inflation is to show users the original prices that they saw when they were collecting their data. It’s the equivalent to saying something like “The prices were €100 back then, which, when adjusted for inflation is around €128 today”.

                I don’t know why you’re moaning here about it anyway, if it bothers you that much, why not contact the site admin or whoever compiled it and moan at them. Maybe you’ll find out the exact reason that they have done it like that too 🤷

                • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  They don’t ‘hide’ them, they literally have a big banner across the chart telling users that ‘this chart is without inflation, scroll over for one with inflation’.

                  Sorry - what word would you use for “not visible” then? I didn’t say they weren’t available. They are… hidden.

                  I don’t know why you’re moaning here about it anyway

                  Because it calls into question the competence and motivation of the people who produced the charts.