People don’t even want you to play a video game in private now.

"Gibbons cut in: “They’re illegal. They are not in any way affiliated with Microsoft. Microsoft, for Minecraft, has gotten a lot of criticism because of those community servers not employing the same safety standards that Microsoft does on their Minecraft servers.”

  • Bruhh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I mean, isn’t there a EULA for hosting MC servers. As long as you agree, you’re free to host. Wonder how long before they rescind it or alter it completely if at all.

    Been playing Vintage Story anyway. It’s giving me that feeling of when I first started playing minecraft. More complex but makes me nostalgic.

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Anything that makes companies lose the slightest bit of control they want to make illegal. If they can’t endlessly milk you for money it’s a problem.

    If Minecraft came out today it would be a subscription service or at the very least would have season packs and cosmetics.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think that if it came out today it would be nothing and fade away, a subscription would never have happened. Notch got very lucky that his particular game, out of the many similar games at the time caught on and was given the time to expand and iterate. Not that Minecraft didn’t become quite cool, but I wish Zach from Zachtronics that made the game that inspired Minecraft (Infiniminer) had gotten more success from it. Then again, if he had, we might not have gotten all the wacky and cool games he released later.

  • Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    20 hours ago

    People really ought to be held legally accountable for explicitly lying in situations like this. Lying to legislators should be illegal just like lying to the courts is purjury

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    1 day ago

    […] and just to clear this up right away: what she said was nonsense. You can, literally right now, head over to the official Minecraft website and download a .jar file to let you run your own private server.

    I love how confidently stupid and wrong she was here.

    What I fucking hate is this pattern of attacks on open source and self-hosting we’ve been seeing. Anthropic’s CEO saying that open source self-hosted LLMs are “dangerous” for example.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Nice LLM you have there. Be a real shame if one that costs 1/10 the price (and another that can run on a consumer rig self hosted) could outperform it.

    • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s not just open source and self-hosting. They’re going after Steam because they actually treat their customers well. Despite still not truly owning your games on their, you basically do. As long as Steam is good, gamers won’t forget that services can be good, and we can’t have that, can we?

          • Tiger_Man_@szmer.info
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            i have all b and a sides, 5 golden berries, and 3 c sides, currently im playing strawberry jam

            • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              waow thats based

              i have two golden berries, i think. i definitely have the winged one, and maybe another.

              ive yet to play strawberry jam. it seems like it might be harder than getting all the golden berries? im not sure.

              • Tiger_Man_@szmer.info
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                strawberry jam has 5 lobbies, the first is comparable to a bit hardrr a-sides, the second is more like b sides and idk how about the rest i didnt play them yet. anyway its much easier than most of goldens, and for sure easier than getting them all because there is only around 200 players who got all the berries (because of farewell)

        • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          For real. I think it ended up being alright, but they sued Valve because of gambling in Counter Strike‽ Like, have they never heard of Overwatch‽

          Meanwhile, “Epic” Games profits off of kids who sneak their parents’ credit cards for whatever nonsense is going on in Fortnite, and Roblox is full of predators!

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yes. This is a classic case of a large company buying an open source product that was specifically designed to get children to be creative and build their own worlds and then deciding that such usage is illegal unless you pay loads of money.

      A perfect snapshot of enshitification.

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Oh but they are VERY dangerous. Dangerous for the 1%’s wealth. What will they do if they have to downsize their billion dollar yachts???

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        But the thing is? They’re not. Billionaires would still be billionaires without attacking open source and self hosting.

        The problem is that billionaires are hungry ghosts. It’s not enough to be fabulously wealthy, they just want more. Forever.

    • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Open source LLMs are very dangerous for their bottom line, they have all the same problems as non open source LLMs and the shareholders don’t even make money off of them!

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    You would think that an organization like this would have a better understanding than the average person

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment_Software_Association

    The Entertainment Software Association (ESA) is the trade association of the video game industry in the United States. It was formed in April 1994 as the Interactive Digital Software Association (IDSA)[1] and renamed on July 21, 2003. It is based in Washington, D.C.[2][3] Most of the top publishers in the video game industry (or their American subsidiaries) are members of the ESA.

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      why would you think that? The ESA is a collection of suits created for the sole purpose of making money. They only care about games insofar as it enriches them.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 day ago

      They “understand” just fine. They’re trying to normalize the destruction of property rights on purpose because they absolutely loathe the idea of anyone not continuously paying them rentier fees for absolutely nothing in return.

      They are evil and must be destroyed.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That’s fine. If property rights don’t exist then there’s no legal basis to charge us with anything if we burn their houses and businesses down. We just need to make sure they’re unoccupied at the time.

  • PapaSkwat@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    I thought only kids played minecraft. Are there really still that many adults playing a children’s game?

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The game came out in 2009. If you started playing as a two-year old child then, you’d be an adult now. A thirteen-year-old child would be a thirty-year-old adult.

      • PapaSkwat@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        So why would a 30-year old adult still be playing a game he played at 13? I understand 13 year olds playing it, I don’t understand 30-year olds playing it

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          There definitely are things you grow out of. Things you liked as a child, that maybe you remember fondly, or can categorise as ‘thing I liked’, but won’t entertain you as an adult. So I understand the core of what you’re saying. But there are more things you liked as a child that, assuming the thing and context hasn’t changed, you would still like as an adult. Did you like Pizza at 13? Did you stop liking Pizza since? Or chocolate cake. Or beer. Or the film Back to the Future?

          The things you liked about Minecraft are still around in modern Minecraft. It’s more likely that you’ll still like it on the same merit than that it appealed to a part of you that has changed.

          • PapaSkwat@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I’ve definitely outgrown most of the movies, toys, and videogames that I enjoyed as a child. The only people I know who play and love minecraft are kids of my friends. Even my daughter outgrew it, and she’s 15.

  • Voxel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Not privacy related.

    Edit: Some people are apparently very delusional. It’s sad, since having proper discussions in spaces like this one becomes almost impossible because of that. I will no longer reply to anything on this comment that fits the category of delusion.

      • Voxel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is about the ESA misunderstanding Microsoft’s and Mojang’s license agreement, nothing more.

        • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It still belongs in privacy. It’s about trying to stop private game servers. That is going against privacy! Learn the word!

          • Voxel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            1 day ago

            So in your definition a private company has to do with privacy? I recommend you take a dictionary and follow your own advice.

            • Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Dude, are you not reading any of the comments towards you? You are completely wrong. You set up your own private server to be private! Take your own advice. Apparently, you have no idea what the definition even is.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Minecraft has chat control enabled by default where any player can report another, have the chat send to Microsoft after which they (or an ai) can decide to ban you from accessing any servers at all.

      Private servers are the only way to block that and create a chat that is safe to use (ironically)

      This is absolutely about privacy.

      • Voxel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Minecraft has chat control enabled by default (…)

        What chat control are you talking about?

        Private servers are the only way to block that and create a chat that is safe to use (ironically)

        You shouldn’t be talking about private content in Minecraft at all, as the chat is inherently insecure. Private server or not.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The one where any random player can report another for any reason and have a portion of the chatlog (without consent of any others) send to Microsoft.

          For reference i have some members on my adult server who like to joke sell sugar as cocaine. There is no info on what actually counts to ban-able, it might just be ai that decides at this point.

          Also there used to be secret library Minecraft servers in china with banned books and thats why there is a separate chinese Minecraft edition now with social media features and all players are identified with all chats monitored.

          “Just don’t type anything private” is not an argument i expect seeing on a privacy community either. Sounds a lot like “if you have nothing to hide”

            • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              The official Minecraft website has an article about a public, private server run by reporters without borders.

              https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/uncensored-library

              https://www.uncensoredlibrary.com/en

              For obvious reasons many copies of this server And predecessors that existed/may operate within oppressive areas do not advertise their existence online.

              Wiki entry of minecraft china edition.

              https://minecraft.wiki/w/China_Edition

              Tap for spoiler
              • Free to download

                • Valid Chinese citizen ID required to play
              • Friends system, with live text chat support

                • Text content in-game may be moderated, such as chat, Book and QuillsWritten BooksSignsCommand Blocks, renamed items (via Anvils) and mobs (via renamed Spawn Eggs or Name Tags)
                • Moderation is also applied to in-launcher content, such as community posts, comments on contents, and private messages. Rental servers and virtual LAN games are not allowed to have names altogether, instead being referred to by a numerical ID

              The argument about minecraft chat being inherently insecure is a straw-man at best. A private server, whitelisted for my own household that runs on hardware that i own is just as secure as any other speech that happens in my living room.

              There is no reason for microsoft to have the ability to steal logs to moderate it. And this is why almost every respectable server i know uses plugins to block that shit.

        • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not gonna call bullshit on them for having a shitty website, lots of IT people are too lazy to make a good website; hell the entire open source ecosystem runs on IT people with shitty websites.

          I’ll call bullshit on them by invoking Hitchens’ Razor on their argument: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. This is extra ironic considering Hitchens’ many unsubstantiated criticisms of socialism.