• Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’d watch US shows where sometimes people would get fired on the spot in in a dramatic way and thought it was just artistic license until I realized Americans literally have no protections and can be fired at will for no reason at all. It is horrifying. What’s even worse is that people celebrate this as a “fluid labor market” , as if placing people under chronic insecurity is a virtue.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I have coworkers from other countries who came to America and asked me if the contract they signed was true - that they can be fired at will.

      It’s incredibly embarrassing.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wouldn’t call the US developed. There is development, with the sky scrapers, mega companies and billionaires, but there are also palaces built in South Africa, North Korea and Turkmenistan. North Korea and Turkmenistan have better infrastructure than the US. But I wouldn’t call insane poverty rates, insane inequality, autocracy, oligarchy, insane incarceration rates, corrupt government and legal system, institutionalized racism and still legal slavery any form of modern development.

  • Cybersheeper@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, there are approximately 190 fully capitalist countries, stop whitewashing capitalism. Capitalist countries also include: Afghanistan, Burundi, South Sudan, DRC and India. Stop with this evolutionist nonsense.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yeah because capitalism is just how things develop without excessive government intervention to prevent it. It’s a lie to say capitalism is a choice. I guess technically you could say it’s a choice between buying food from a farmer or starving to death, but really that’s not much of a choice. The two biggest famines in history were cause by socialist countries taking direct control of the agriculture industry.

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    So you say, that the US has the purest capitalism while everyone else has diluted it with some soviet communism?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t have kids so why should I pay for their healthcare

      That’s how they justify it. They’re fucking ghouls

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem is there’s a false scarcity. Healthcare is expensive for people in the US right now, so the idea of paying for someone else’s healthcare via universal healthcare doesn’t sound like a good thing, it sounds like taking the money you need for your healthcare to pay for someone else’s.

      It’s NOT like that, but people have it in their heads that it is. And it’s very hard to change a made up mind when there are people rallying against it to protect their own private interests.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s no reason to not have universal healthcare.

        Sure, some people think as you describe, but they are the minority. We’re supposed to be a representative democracy.

        • 90% of Democrats want universal healthcare. (30% of voters)
        • 70% of Independents want universal healthcare. (40% of voters)
        • Even 40% of Republicans want universal healthcare. (30% of voters)

        (many polls, pick your favorite)

        bOtH pArTiEs think otherwise, unfortunately

        • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh no I totally agree with you. Not saying it justifies it or even that the math makes sense, but it feels that a lot of times when you have people who dissent against universal healthcare the reason I stated is why.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They believe rights are a pie. And if someone else gets a piece of that pie, they will somehow end up with less pie.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even within free market logic free healthcare just makes sense. It enables people to more comfortably quit their job to start a business or take any better job. It also allows people more freedom to choose medical professionals based on their merits rather than on who their insurer says they can use.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s also cheaper for everyone, and results in much better outcomes on average. It’s truly win/win/win.

        The only losers would be the insurance companies that would no longer exist. And fuck them.

        • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          The stupid thing is that even this isn’t necessarily the case. Even in countries that have public healthcare, there are still private options for those who want “fancier” care. The true statement is that they would only be able to rip off the wealthy, instead of everyone in the country.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Even within free market logic free healthcare just makes sense.

        It doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t maximize the short term profits of a health care business.

        It enables people to more comfortably quit their job

        No American capitalist wants this.

        You can be hired. You can be fired. You can’t go around quitting without your boss’s permission.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can’t fathom how anyone is against free healthcare

      “We CaN’T aFfOrD iT! wE wIlL rUn OuT oF mOnEy!”

      Every fucking time it’s suggested. Every fucking time, you get some clown screaming about how it costs too much and it will bankrupt the country and how health care will go away if you try to federalize it.

      And under this government? Maybe they’re right. Maybe American business leadership would just rip the wires out of the walls anyways. Look at what UK politicians have done to the NHS, ffs.

      It’s very possible that Americans don’t have access to health care because we are simply too greedy and cruel and stupid as a population to value it above carpet bombing the Global South.

        • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          And to give to Elon Musk for him to lose. He went down from 1.45 trillion to 970 billion. Like what? Half a trillion dollars lost?

          I don’t even use numbers like that in a fucking video game…

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The issue really seems to be old people. And where I live it’s a whole lot easier for old people to vote.

    • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because to them, the fight against the Others is so profoundly tied to their core identity that they would choose a rapacious trillionaire or low rent pedophile mob boss to lead them despite OVERWHELMING evidence either would gladly see them dead for a nickel.

      Anyone not of their inner circle (church, Trump worship, family of they accede to the previous conditions) are the enemy. And they don’t deserve even basic human rights. Unless they’re a zygote/fetus, in which case they get a pass until birth.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hungary also did that under Orbán, but we were told once we will have enough “national billionaires”, the money will start to trickle down. When the billionaires arrived and we asked when the money will finally trickle down, we were told money is not everything, and we’re acting like “spoiled children”.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ha, you think the rest of the world doesn’t profit off slavery…

      • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Who said that? There a ghost in here? Which countries have it baked into their constitutions? 13th amendment.

        • mechoman444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are you kidding me?

          Brazil - slavery was abolished by ordinary law in 1888 (“Lei Áurea”), predating the current 1988 constitution, which then enshrined the prohibition directly in its text.

          Mauritania - abolished slavery by decree in 1981, then criminalized it more explicitly through legislation in 2007, though this was statutory rather than a constitutional amendment.

          India (1950) – Article 23 prohibits trafficking in human beings and forced labor, including slavery-like practices. South Africa (1996) – Section 13 of the Bill of Rights bans slavery, servitude, and forced labor.

          Germany – Article 1 combined with statutory law prohibits slavery under the broader human dignity clause.

          Ghana (1992) – explicitly prohibits slavery in its Bill of Rights.

          Ethiopia (1995) – its constitution includes a slavery prohibition.

          Many Latin American constitutions (Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, etc.) contain explicit anti-slavery clauses, often tracing back to 19th-century independence-era abolition.

          People acting like America is the only country that had slaves. Here’s another list for your edification!

          Portugal - among the earliest and largest traders, especially to Brazil

          Britain - dominant by the 18th century, especially via Liverpool and Bristol

          France - significant role, especially to the Caribbean (Saint-Domingue/Haiti)

          Spain - mainly through licensing other nations (asiento system) to supply its colonies

          Netherlands - major early trader, especially via the Dutch West India Company

          Denmark - smaller but notable participant.

          And what country has the most stringent laws concerning slavery and human trafficking that would be America. We hate human traffickers more than we hate pedophiles around here.

          • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Are you fucking joking lmao. Those are all countries which have banned slavery.

            America has never banned slavery. In fact, they baked it into the constitution.

            Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States

            Fucking disgusting country that still uses hundreds of thousands of slaves to this day!!

            • mechoman444@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’ve already addressed the constitutional aspect of slavery in the United States.

              There is no form of slavery in the U.S. that is supported by either the government or the general public.

              Slavery and human trafficking are among the most serious crimes you can commit in America and are prosecuted aggressively with severe penalties.

              We do not have legal slavery. What we do have is significant wealth and wage inequality, which is an entirely different discussion worth having, just not here.

              At this point, it feels like you just want to take cheap shots at America. That’s your prerogative. We allow that sort of criticism here. Criticize the country all you want.

              We’re still better than you.

              • Krono@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                According to the ACLU, prisoners at the Louisiana State Pen (Angola) pick cotton and sugarcane for $0.02/hr. Many must work for up to 3 years without pay to be eligible for this wage.

                Those who “choose” not to work are placed in solitary confinement, a practice that is considered torture in most first world nations.

                You can read the full report here Captive Labor: Exploitation of Incarcerated Workers

                • mechoman444@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Ok. Louisiana has one of the worst prison systems in America. The judicial system is irrationally racist against black men.

                  Congratulations on pinpointing one of the horrendous social issues that we have in America.

                  What country are you from?

              • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                America is one of the worst empires to ever exist lmao, you’re not better than anyone at all.

                Slavery and human trafficking aren’t crimes at all in America. The president is a pedophile rapist human trafficker, and you use prisoners as slaves in almost every state!! You know nothing of your own country, or you’re willfully evil to defend it!

                • mechoman444@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  17 hours ago

                  Right.

                  I’ve done absolutely nothing to defend my country. In fact, I’ve been criticizing it quite heavily.

                  I’ll correct you once again: slavery, pedophilia, and human trafficking are all extremely illegal in this country, and they are punished severely.

                  The fact that the people associated with the Epstein files, including our own president have not been arrested, held accountable, and punished is a black stain on our history that we may never fully recover from.

                  So, what country are you from?

    • lemonbun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      all cool for down with murcia but please tell me where actually is. Yeah we have underpaid workers but slavery?

            • lemonbun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I think prison reform is a seperate topic from slavery, but you do give up your rights in prison, which would include the 13th amendment. Many countries have much more terrible prison conditions.

              Either way in the 1800s slaves didn’t have as much of a choice to be a slave, today prisoners mostly had a choice before committing a crime (though I acknowledge not every person in jail deserves or should be there). I just think that should be awknowledge before saying America still has “slaves”. At the end of the day the law is what allows us to have the society we have today (for better or worse).

              • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Lmfao. You’re disgusting. No, not very many countries have worse prisons than America, At least not other comparable western nations.

                • lemonbun@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  How is that disgusting? Admitting that you lose rights in prison? You’re literally just trolling for a reaction. I can think of a handful of EU countries with much smaller populations that have it better. Comparing black slaves from the 1800s to modern day prisoners is what’s disgusting

  • Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The corrupt gop fuckers will recreate the commie folk devil that worked during the cold war, they will claim communism will end America they will turn voting for social democracy into national crisis

    They are always lying

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly FOX News might be the organization, which helped the term “socialism” the most in the US. When you call every good policy “socialist” then people wanting that will call themself that.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s the abuse of the system, the tax hikes, the standard of care given vs the biased care we can exploit now and the amount of productivity lost is bad for the US. Why? Idfk, that’s just what they tell us.

      So I guess the only thing we can do is try to cha ge at least one of them.

      Remember Obamacare? The socialized healthcare system where everyone had health insurance? We should go back to that.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        and the amount of productivity lost is bad for the US. Why? Idfk, that’s just what they tell us.

        The US would not loose productivity at all. For any health care system it is cheaper to prevent somebody from getting sick, then to pay for the treatment. So countries with such systems have good reason to have strong environmental and food regulation for example. Hence people are less sick and can therefore work.

        • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The US has pretty decent/good air quality compared to a lot of countries both developed and under developed. At least we don’t have to deal with what India, China or Brazil have to deal with when it comes to air quality. I mean it’s not the greatest there’s still people who live with air purifiers because of pollutants, toxins and generalized pollen but you can leave your house in every single state at any given time without choking or needing PPE.

          Food could be better. Food here could be a lot better but you know what it is. It’s the sickening supply and demand. Think about it we get year round produce because we ship it in. There’s an Asian market that’s near me and a (half dead) stop and shop 2 blocks from it. The Asian market has in-season only produce and has an on site butcher. A lot of other countries I hear do the same as the Asian market and I still have no idea if it’s true but we have hydroponically grown food in the off-season.

          The only areas in the US that actually rely on local produce are areas that have produce that they’re known for. Like Georgia Peaches, Maine Blueberries and Massachusetts/New York Mcintosh Apples and then those areas are all tourist and rely on tourism. The FDA Doesn’t give a fuck about our meat as much as we’d like to think, I mean our chicken wings can still have feathers and there’s known low quality butchers. Our beef supply is being cut like there’s no one even inspecting the fat vs lean meat ratio and everything that’s lean has a lower shelf life because its more, “fresh,” (after it’s been treated) and the odds of a grass-fed cut of meat smelling like fish is higher than a non grass-fed cut of meat which are usually starting to gray and those are unless you go to a good quality butcher BUT THEN you face a sourcing issue which they’re all known to get their meat from Costco or BJ’s.

          Pork is absolute trash in this country, I’ve been trying to stay away from pork.

    • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Nah, been going on probably before the banana republics. Soon as the people of the banana republic fought back, the American capitalist would cry socialism, then the American army would come and squash the uprising. Hey Mr. tally man tally me banana.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s not socialism

    Bro, it’s socialism.

    Some of it is national socialism, so maybe don’t get too enthusiastic about how the Brits segregate out their health care services or the Germans treat unemployed immigrants or the French handle non-native speakers trying to form a union.

    But all of this has socialist economic organizing at its foundation.

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not actually though. you’re confusing nordic welfare states for socialism, there are even variants of socialism like market socialism with none of these.

      Socialism is strictly about worker owned means of production.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        you’re confusing nordic welfare states for socialism

        Nordic states reorganized themselves from feudal agrarian military economies into industrial social welfare economies over the course of the late 19th and 20th centuries. Their party politics and bureaucratic reorganization was explicitly informed by socialist theories and economic models devised during that time.

        Socialism is strictly about worker owned means of production.

        Strong unions, state owned industries, and Democratic governance gives working Scandenavians direct say over and profit from their local economies

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It being inspired by socialism doesn’t change the fact that the workers don’t own the means of production there and it is therefore not socialism. Them having more say because they have unions is not the same.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            workers don’t own the means of production

            Workers control the means of production through the democratic state

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              they don’t though, they regulate it and apply some pressure, but these are still privately held, socialism is always in contrast to private ownership.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                socialism is always in contrast to private ownership

                The Nordic Model is public ownership of high value industry (most notably, the O&G industry). They also have universal healthcare and free education, which come as a byproduct of state owned and operated medical centers and schools. And strong union membership puts a public leash on private enterprises at the level of direct worker action.

                • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  “The government controls around 35% of the total value of publicly listed companies on the Oslo stock exchange, with five of its largest seven listed firms partially owned by the state.[34]” good, but not socialism. Free healthcare and schools are not related to socialism.