• spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    evidence from a single study suggests pigeons may not be wired to repeat behaviors that have rewarded them previously, instead opting to try new behaviors

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Thank you!
      And IMO that would be an exceedingly strange takeaway as I see it in general, pigeons being some classic Pavlovian-exhibiting animals as it were. So then, perhaps what’s being suggested here is that they’re more exploratory and exhibit much more free will and unpredictability than previously imagined…?

      Or something like that?

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Something like that. I think the study wasn’t designed/interpreted well to demonstrate variable behavior.

        They presented the pigeons with 5 differently colored buttons. 5 button presses of any color in any order would dispense a food reward.

        The pigeons continued to press random buttons and get their food. The researchers argued that since the pigeons didn’t press the same sequence every time, or the same button 5 times in a row, that this demonstrates they prefer to try new behaviors rather than stick with ones they know result in a reward.

        I think they might be giving the pigeons too much credit, intelligence-wise… but I’m kind of a pigeon hater so I’m severely biased lol

        • weew@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I think they’ve only found that pigeons can’t count to 5

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Did they have a control group where the colors did matter? If there was never a condition of it mattering, why would anyone vary the presses, unless they just liked pressing red a lot, or the easier to reach buttons, or something else. Seems like an experiment that had already determined the result.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Well, it does tend to happen with rats/monkeys/people.

            If 5 buttons all work the same way, you just hit whichever one is closest or whatever, over and over again. You spam it, hit it as fast as you can.

            I can wake up my computer by hitting any key, I have something like 50 keys to choose from, I click the mouse every time.

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          5 button presses of any color in any order would dispense a food reward.

          With rules like that, I don’t understand why you would expect the pigeons to repeat the same sequence. Of course, this is yet another study that shouldn’t have even made it through peer review.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            With rules like that I would expect people to split onto two groups: ones that learn one pattern and repeat it because it’s a guaranteed result, and one that tries to find a counterexample to the rule they thought of at first. The fact that pigeons try different patterns kind of makes them more clever in my eyes.

            But it’s known that pigeons perform better than humans in Monty Hall problem, so they are really pretty smart when it comes to statistics, it seems

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            They thought the pigeons would develop a favourite button or a favourite pattern. But the pigeons prefer variety over favourites.

        • justaman123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yeah it seems that probably pigeons didn’t know what worked or didn’t work and since they never got a wrong answer after 5 button pushes, nothing mattered. Did they push the buttons faster?

          • justaman123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah maybe they were wondering if they could get something better to happen and there was no cost in just pushing random buttons so why not

        • Kraiden@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Also wouldn’t that mean that pigeons wouldn’t be trainable with treats?

          I have a friend who trains WILD pigeons with food, so… doubt

      • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Unless they just find pushing the different buttons more fun than pushing the same button 5 times. “haha buttons go brrrrrr”

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The prisoner experiment, the marshmallow test, now the pigeon experiments of the Skinner Box. Which psychology experiment will stand the test of time?